Posts

I have a vehicle at a Jeep showroom being "fixed" They've had it 45 days. It should be Covered under my guarantee


I have a vehicle at a Jeep showroom being "fixed" They've had it 45 days. It should be Covered under my guarantee. At first the showroom said it was the Cam so they destroyed the motor supplant the cam and charged the guarantee. At the test drive they understood it wasn't the cam and it was something special to do with cam rings, they destroyed the motor supplanted the rings and charged the guarantee organization. After that test drive that actually didn't fix the issue. Presently they're discussing absolutely supplanting the motor however said the guarantee organization wasn't probably would not cover this is on the grounds that they've depleted the assets. I didn't advise the showroom what to fix I just said fix it and return it once again to me. Would it be advisable for me I be considered answerable for the substitution of a motor when they misdiagnosed twice and charged the guarantee organization two separate times?Where as though this was done the initial time around the guarantee organization would have no issue covering it. They have charged the guarantee organization more than $6000 altogether
Also I want my vehicle back!

Post a Comment

welcome to legal advice supports